|
| Though the war is never named in the prints, the images are unmistakable: American flags, Arabic writing on mosque walls, 9/11 newspaper headlines, Senate hearings, and water torture. With titles such as "Obsession," "Invasion," "Incursion," "Desecration," "Humiliation," and "Repercussion," there is no doubt you are viewing scenes of Iraq. The paintings, however, are a different story: one of them is called "Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld Presenting His Plan for the Invasion of Iraq, 2006"; another is named "The Liberation of Baghdad, 2006." |
|
As a special treat, visitors to the museum can compare Birk's new 2007 series to Callot's 1633 prints (on loan from the UCLA Grunwald Center for the Graphic Arts), are on view in an adjacent gallery. The side-by-side inspection afforded here reveals that Birk admires Callot tremendously and follows the cool, detached aesthetic of 17th century war prints. Compare Birk's "Obsession" to Callot's "The Recruitment of Troops." Compare his "Destruction" to Callot's "Plundering and Burning a Village." Compare "Desecration" to Callot's "Destruction of a Convent." But Birk’s personal feelings seep through as a powerful subtext, just as Goya's did in his stance against Napoleon’s invasion of Spain.
Many of the scenes are based on pictures snapped by war photographers embedded with the troops in Iraq. Others come directly from television news footage and/or the Internet. As such, Birk's contemporary wood-cut prints are a compilation of hundreds of real-life, news-media photographs presented in the form of traditional academic art. Will the madness never stop or does another adage hold true? "Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose" (the more things change, the more they remain the same). |