|
| Contrary to popular opinion, Orange County is not Orange. It is White. Or, at least, the southern half is (lily-)white, and South Orange County is the location of the Laguna Art Museum, tucked away in one of the most expensive, elite, exclusive, and predominantly white enclaves in Southern California. The curator of this museum, Tyler Stallings thus displays uncommon courage in mounting an exhibition called Whiteness, a Wayward Construction, specifically designed to call attention to the cultural condition of being White and its attendant advantages. Far from being a politically neutral formal category, Whiteness is here considered, according to Stallings, as "an ideology of power." Those who wear white (skin) are inherently and unavoidably unaware that they have gone through life clad in the shining armor of acceptance, privilege, dominance, and power. The customs and beliefs of whiteness become a shared and inhaled identity, linking millions who have nothing else in common but power embedded in skin color. The more whiteness exists as an unseen standard, the more powerful it becomes. |
|
Whiteness, Stallings explains, is "wayward" because the concept is malleable and thus "ungovernable." He could have also added, but lets the art included in Whiteness make the point for him, that whiteness is also artificial, and that this condition of constructed slipperiness makes whiteness difficult to see, hard to pin down and impossible to eradicate. White is an invisible non-color and, in social practice is an unseen category. One can only attempt to point at whiteness, if only to draw an outline before it fades once again into invisibility. Whiteness also implies that which may be erased. Consider the terms "white out" and "whitewash " which imply that something is underneath (power) but it (dominance) has been covered up. For the power of whiteness to function it must be both insinuated and unexplained, like magic, like religion.
Far from being only a social topic or a political issue, whiteness is a concept uniquely suited to art, as it takes on meaning only when it is codified into visual signs. Whiteness is based upon the visual, the visible, and would make no sense without vision. To a blind person, "race" does not exist, only humanity. The construction of whiteness may be understood as a cultural act rooted in the visual. Western art has been guilty of a centuries-long historical complicity in visualizing the inferiority of dark (black) and superiority of light (white). Whiteness became freighted with floating signifiers of superiority. |
|
The precarious "superiority" of "white trash," once a staple of Jim Crow-era politicians in America, is a direct or implied issue in works by Annalee Newitz, Matthew Wray, Gary Simmons, and Andres Serrano. Their visual discussion revolves around hierarchies of racial blends, and they call attention to persons of mixed ethnicity to track the semiotics of forbidden desire--the in-between of black and white that creates another shade, whether from love or rape or sacrifice. The convoluted historical designation of whiteness may well shape-shift once again as this show is in progress. Although in the works for several years, Whiteness is an unexpectedly timely exhibition, particularly in the context of the upcoming Supreme Court decision on affirmative action. This politically charged event makes Whiteness a natural potential lightning rod for controversy. Curator Stallings, not to mention the museums daring in gathering a prominent cross-section of California and national artists who both address issues of cultural identity and expose the apparatus of whiteness from a racial standpoint is breathtaking. When reminded that they are empowered by the mere virtue of their whiteness, white people typically tend to react with reflexive guilt, denial, defensiveness, or alternatively with defiance. An exhibition that digs at these uncomfortable feelings will generate controversy independent of the news of the moment. This curators show simply does not permit the museum to remain the pure White Cube for transcendent art, but insists that art should be involved, engaged and, above all, contextualized within contemporary culture. Whiteness asserts this perspective in the midst of a period of change, as our society sexually mingles and socially mellows into a mélange of shades that increasingly resist categorical identity. And if California is the (non)racial future, then the bi-polar semiotics of racism will over time become non-operational. What will happen to the power of whiteness? What is the point of a black verses white dialectic when we are all crème brulée? One hopes that the art on view illuminates and contributes to this continuing evolution. |
|